On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Gary Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > Can someone explain all of the different kernel choices found > in meta-fsl-arm?
I've been trying to collect this kind of information in RN: http://freescale.github.io/doc/release-notes/2.1/index.html#linux-kernel Otavio, I'm sorry, I forgot to update the RN as you've asked. I'm going to start this update right now. > > $ ls meta-fsl-arm/recipes-kernel/linux/*.bb > meta-fsl-arm/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_4.6.bb > meta-fsl-arm/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-imx_4.1-1.0.x.bb > meta-fsl-arm/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-imx-rt_4.1-1.0.x.bb > meta-fsl-arm/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx_4.1.15.bb > meta-fsl-arm/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx-mfgtool_4.1.15.bb > meta-fsl-arm/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ls1_3.12.bb > > I build for [my own] i.MX6Q/i.MX6DL/i.MX6Solo/i.MX6UL boards. > Which of the meta-fsl-arm recipes might be the best to follow/use? The very best is kernel.org, but for some applications it may no be realistic. The second place, in my point of view, would be meta-fsl-arm/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-imx_4.1-1.0.x.bb because you can send a pull request, and then only bump the recipe. But, it's very individual answer. Daiane > > n.b. I've been using the Boundary Devices versions from meta-fsl-arm-extra > because I also have a SabreLite (now replaced by Nitrogen6x), but > I'm happy to switch if it makes sense. > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Gary Thomas | Consulting for the > MLB Associates | Embedded world > ------------------------------------------------------------ > -- > _______________________________________________ > meta-freescale mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
