> -----Original Message----- > From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2016 10:47 PM > To: Ting Liu <[email protected]> > Cc: Zhenhua Luo <[email protected]>; meta- > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-freescale-layer][PATCH 00/50] QorIQ > patches > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Ting Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Otavio, > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 9:53 PM > >> To: Zhenhua Luo <[email protected]> > >> Cc: Ting Liu <[email protected]>; [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-freescale-layer][PATCH 00/50] > >> QorIQ patches > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Zhenhua Luo <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > Can you please review and merge the remaining patches of QorIQ SDK > 2.0? > >> Currently the kernel build is blocked for QorIQ targets. Attached is > >> the latest CI report. > >> > >> I merged a number of changes since you made the branch and to be > >> honest I assumed they were the same stuff; please rebase the tree and > >> let me know when it is ready for review again please. > > [Liu Ting-B28495] I did not see new commits on github meta-freescale layer > since Jul 22. > > The tree I sent on July 23 was already based on the latest. > > I sent the patches I think are fine to master-next; the device tree path > changes seems unclear for me. Why it is need?
[Liu Ting-B28495] a sub-folder fsl/ under arch/powerpc/boot/dts/ was created to hold all the device tree files in kernel source: http://git.freescale.com/git/cgit.cgi/ppc/sdk/linux.git/tree/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl?h=sdk-v2.0.x -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
