Hello Max, On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Max Krummenacher <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > > 2016-10-26 14:15 GMT+02:00 Otavio Salvador <[email protected]>: >> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Daiane Angolini <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Otavio Salvador >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hello everyone, >>>>> >>>>> In 2015 an effort to unify the i.MX and QorIQ BSP layers has been >>>>> started and today we are finally moving the FSL Community BSP to use >>>>> the result of this work. >>>> >>>> I think this is a good opportunity to rename the project as well. >>>> Instead of using FSL Community BSP we could use FSL Community PDK. >>> >>> Speaking in renaming: why don't we use NXP instead of FSL? > > In OE/Yocto a distro layer is some thing special. So using distro in a > layer name which is not a distro layer is sort of confusing. > > If there is another rename ahead, I would propose to also consider to > not use '-distro' in meta-freescale-distro. I don't know what was the > rationale to no longer user the '-demo', if one does not want to use > demo one could use e.g. > ...-sw or ...-user.
Because the layer is going to include the distros. One huge problem we have now is that the community release and the NXP release use different components for few core items (kernel, gstreamer plugin, u-boot) and we are cooking the different set of distros so users can easily reproduce the NXP release. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
