On 03/10/2017 02:30 PM, Bob Cochran wrote:
On 03/08/2017 04:26 AM, Zhenhua Luo wrote:
[Zhenhua Luo] my suggestion is to update
skip-rules-for-mmc-rpmb-partition.patch, do you mind to send a patch?
From: meta-freescale-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-freescale-
boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Bob Cochran
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2017 11:32 PM
It's trying to add
So, is it better to update skip-rules-for-mmc-rpmb-partition.patch
or just remove
eudev_%.bbappend from recipes-core/udev?
Will do, but I'm going to try to understand the need for it first and
why it doesn't apply to QoriQ ARM.
I think we should get rid of the eudev_%.bbappend file and related patch
because it's no longer needed.
At one point eudev/systemd had a similar patch as what meta-freescale
has, but it was replaced by commit d2313434 (rules: storage - replace
blacklist with explicit whitelist)
$ git log -p d2313434
Author: Kay Sievers <k...@vrfy.org>
Date: Thu Mar 12 15:03:30 2015 +0100
rules: storage - relace blacklist with explicit whitelist
Newly added kernel drivers repeatedly pass our blacklist and
cause trouble for the devices, because they do not expect to
be examined by udev's default rules which include blkid.
This turns the blacklist into a whitelist. Device type which
need support for additional symlinks need to be added to the
@@ -12,9 +12,7 @@ ACTION=="remove", GOTO="persistent_storage_end"
ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="module", KERNEL=="block",
-# skip rules for inappropriate block devices
Also, I tested this morning a 4.51 eMMC card with RPMB on a LS1021A-TWR
with a Yocto built image and no eudev patch. It behaved properly - udev
Zhenhua, if you agree, I'll submit a patch that removes eudev_%.bbappend
and its patch.
meta-freescale mailing list