On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Daiane Angolini <daiane.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Otavio Salvador
> <otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Fabio Berton
>> <fabio.ber...@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
>>> Why not rename machine file to imx6sabresd and imx6sabreauto, once these
>>> machine are for solo, dual, quad and quad plus, or "qdl" doesn't mean that
>>> the machine configuration is only for quad and dual?
>>
>> That is a good question indeed.
>>
>> Essentially we are following the kernel here. Basically the Quad and
>> DualLite are the two SoC die we support as the Dual and Solo are
>> reduced versions of those. The QuadPlus is a Quad with a newer
>> revision so in the end of the day it is right ;-)
>
> I don't have strong arguments on this topic. But I think Fabio's
> suggestions is way more beautiful.
>
> (the argument here is beauty, so weak argument. And in fact I can say
> it without stumbling)

My biggest concern about using the imx6 without qdl is that for me it
says it works for all (q, dl, sx, ul, sl, sll, ...).


-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
-- 
_______________________________________________
meta-freescale mailing list
meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale

Reply via email to