I have added a note for meta-fsl-ppc layer to indicate the migration from
meta-fsl-ppc to meta-freescale, meanwhile, meta-fsl-ppc is marked to inactive.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: meta-freescale-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-freescale-
> boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Otavio Salvador
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 2:25 AM
> To: Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
> Cc: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] is meta-fsl-ppc layer even used anymore?
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
> > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
> >> > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > i was having trouble building for t1042d4rdb with the
> >> >> > meta-fsl-ppc layer until i noticed that the meta-freescale layer
> >> >> > had a machine definition for the same target. does the
> >> >> > meta-freescale layer obsolete meta-fsl-ppc?
> >> >>
> >> >> Yes. meta-freescale provides it all.
> >> >
> >> > then it might be useful to remove links to superseded meta-fsl-*
> >> > layers from
> >> > https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/
> >> For meta-fsl-arm I added, long time ago, a note:
> >> For morty and newer releases, use the meta-freescale layer instead.
> >> Now to be even more clear, I setted it to inactive.
> > excellent.
> >> The meta-fsl-ppc, I don't have control on the metadata to update it.
> >> I am adding Luo to look at it.
> > so does that mean meta-fsl-ppc has also been folded into
> > meta-freescale? or is it still meant to be used independently?
> Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
> http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
> meta-freescale mailing list
meta-freescale mailing list