TBH, I hadn't realised it was the close source kernel, it was just
whatever I was using before. I had assumed that linux-fslc-imx was the
closed source and linux-imx was the open source! I have an iMX6 and the
following are recipes are within meta-freescale, which should I be using?
linux-fslc
linux-fslc-4.9
linux-fslc-imx
linux-fslc-imx-rt
linux-imx-4.9.88
Best regards,
Joe
On 31/08/18 02:12, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 8:13 AM Joe Rutledge <[email protected]> wrote:
I have a question about Vivante support within the linux-imx kernel from
meta-freescale and how to correctly use it within my image. I have
recently started moving my existing working image from Krogoth to Sumo.
I'm having great trouble getting it to build now though, I seem to have
constant circular dependencies between PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/egl
and its many friends.
What packages do I need in my image recipe to get back the Vivante
support for an EGLFS Qt platform, based on the linux-imx kernel? Do I
need to tweak a specific set of PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/*gl*
variables to get that package list to work correctly?
Many, many thanks in advance to anyone that can help, this is driving me
nuts!
I did not use any customer in Sumo using Qt *with* closed source BSP.
We have people running Qt under mainline BSP with success. Do you need
the closed source BSP?
--
_______________________________________________
meta-freescale mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
