On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 9:22 AM Gary Bisson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 12:07 AM Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> > > --- > > recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-boundary-fw-utils_2018.07.bb | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-boundary-fw-utils_2018.07.bb > b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-boundary-fw-utils_2018.07.bb > > index 0a7697a..804a504 100644 > > --- a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-boundary-fw-utils_2018.07.bb > > +++ b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-boundary-fw-utils_2018.07.bb > > @@ -44,4 +44,5 @@ RPROVIDES_${PN} += "u-boot-fw-utils" > > BBCLASSEXTEND = "cross" > > > > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(imx)" > > -COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_class-cross = "(.*)" > > +COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_class-cross_arm = "(.*)" > > +COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_class-cross_aarch64 = "(.*)" > > Sorry for the dumb question but why is class-cross needed in the first > place? Isn't MACHINE = (imx) sufficient to only target imx platforms > which can only be arm/arm64. Honestly I don’t know what the usecase is I am just trying to avoid the spill it’s having for non arm machines Ideally native recipe should have been enough but since I am not using it someone who has a usecase should chime in and probably just delete the cross portion > > > Regards, > Gary >
-- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
