Signed-off-by: Anuj Mittal <[email protected]>
---
 ...nd-NULL-define-for-os-and-ut-builds.patch} | 33 +++++++------------
 ....00.00.0369.bb => ipmctl_03.00.00.0387.bb} |  8 ++---
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
 rename 
dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-support/ipmctl/ipmctl/{0001-Ignore-STATIC_ASSERT-and-NULL-definition-so-we-can-c.patch
 => 0001-Ignore-STATIC_ASSERTs-and-NULL-define-for-os-and-ut-builds.patch} (59%)
 rename 
dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-support/ipmctl/{ipmctl_03.00.00.0369.bb
 => ipmctl_03.00.00.0387.bb} (82%)

diff --git 
a/dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-support/ipmctl/ipmctl/0001-Ignore-STATIC_ASSERT-and-NULL-definition-so-we-can-c.patch
 
b/dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-support/ipmctl/ipmctl/0001-Ignore-STATIC_ASSERTs-and-NULL-define-for-os-and-ut-builds.patch
similarity index 59%
rename from 
dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-support/ipmctl/ipmctl/0001-Ignore-STATIC_ASSERT-and-NULL-definition-so-we-can-c.patch
rename to 
dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-support/ipmctl/ipmctl/0001-Ignore-STATIC_ASSERTs-and-NULL-define-for-os-and-ut-builds.patch
index 4a3b26c7..7fede93c 100644
--- 
a/dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-support/ipmctl/ipmctl/0001-Ignore-STATIC_ASSERT-and-NULL-definition-so-we-can-c.patch
+++ 
b/dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-support/ipmctl/ipmctl/0001-Ignore-STATIC_ASSERTs-and-NULL-define-for-os-and-ut-builds.patch
@@ -1,19 +1,12 @@
-From cc0e412ad05574d22938586172c56863666eb2a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Nolan Hergert <[email protected]>
-Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 11:15:09 +0800
-Subject: [PATCH] Ignore STATIC_ASSERT and NULL definition so we can compile in
- OS
 
-Upstream-Status: Backport [from ipmctl patches; 
https://github.com/intel/ipmctl/blob/development/src/os/patches/0001-Ignore-STATIC_ASSERTs-and-NULL-define-for-os-and-ut-builds.patch]
+Upstream-Status: Backport
+Signed-off-by: Anuj Mittal <[email protected]>
 
-Signed-off-by: Nolan Hergert <[email protected]>
-Signed-off-by: Naveen Saini <[email protected]>
----
- MdePkg/Include/Base.h | 13 ++++++++++++-
- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+ MdePkg/Include/Base.h | 12 ++++++++++++
+ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
 
 diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/Base.h b/MdePkg/Include/Base.h
-index 8e4271f6ea..c39511a064 100644
+index 2da08b0c78..072eefdb94 100644
 --- a/MdePkg/Include/Base.h
 +++ b/MdePkg/Include/Base.h
 @@ -318,7 +318,11 @@ struct _LIST_ENTRY {
@@ -28,26 +21,25 @@ index 8e4271f6ea..c39511a064 100644
  
  //
  // Null character
-@@ -809,7 +813,8 @@ typedef UINTN  *BASE_LIST;
- // Verify that ProcessorBind.h produced UEFI Data Types that are compliant 
with
+@@ -810,6 +814,8 @@ typedef UINTN  *BASE_LIST;
  // Section 2.3.1 of the UEFI 2.3 Specification.
  //
--
+ 
 +#ifndef OS_BUILD
 +#ifndef UNIT_TEST_UEFI_BUILD
  STATIC_ASSERT (sizeof (BOOLEAN) == 1, "sizeof (BOOLEAN) does not meet UEFI 
Specification Data Type requirements");
  STATIC_ASSERT (sizeof (INT8)    == 1, "sizeof (INT8) does not meet UEFI 
Specification Data Type requirements");
  STATIC_ASSERT (sizeof (UINT8)   == 1, "sizeof (UINT8) does not meet UEFI 
Specification Data Type requirements");
-@@ -821,6 +826,8 @@ STATIC_ASSERT (sizeof (INT64)   == 8, "sizeof (INT64) does 
not meet UEFI Specifi
- STATIC_ASSERT (sizeof (UINT64)  == 8, "sizeof (UINT64) does not meet UEFI 
Specification Data Type requirements");
- STATIC_ASSERT (sizeof (CHAR8)   == 1, "sizeof (CHAR8) does not meet UEFI 
Specification Data Type requirements");
+@@ -823,6 +829,8 @@ STATIC_ASSERT (sizeof (CHAR8)   == 1, "sizeof (CHAR8) does 
not meet UEFI Specifi
  STATIC_ASSERT (sizeof (CHAR16)  == 2, "sizeof (CHAR16) does not meet UEFI 
Specification Data Type requirements");
+ STATIC_ASSERT (sizeof (L'A')    == 2, "sizeof (L'A') does not meet UEFI 
Specification Data Type requirements");
+ STATIC_ASSERT (sizeof (L"A")    == 4, "sizeof (L\"A\") does not meet UEFI 
Specification Data Type requirements");
 +#endif
 +#endif
  
  //
  // The following three enum types are used to verify that the compiler
-@@ -841,9 +848,13 @@ typedef enum {
+@@ -843,9 +851,13 @@ typedef enum {
    __VerifyUint32EnumValue = 0xffffffff
  } __VERIFY_UINT32_ENUM_SIZE;
  
@@ -62,5 +54,4 @@ index 8e4271f6ea..c39511a064 100644
  /**
    Macro that returns a pointer to the data structure that contains a 
specified field of
 -- 
-2.17.1
-
+2.31.0.windows.1
diff --git 
a/dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-support/ipmctl/ipmctl_03.00.00.0369.bb
 
b/dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-support/ipmctl/ipmctl_03.00.00.0387.bb
similarity index 82%
rename from 
dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-support/ipmctl/ipmctl_03.00.00.0369.bb
rename to 
dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-support/ipmctl/ipmctl_03.00.00.0387.bb
index 48140a65..411c45ad 100644
--- 
a/dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-support/ipmctl/ipmctl_03.00.00.0369.bb
+++ 
b/dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-support/ipmctl/ipmctl_03.00.00.0387.bb
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = 
"file://LICENSE;md5=72b9da60da6219d612ce30b746a0fe71  \
 
 SRC_URI = 
"git://github.com/intel/ipmctl.git;protocol=https;branch=development;name=ipmctl;
 \
         
git://github.com/tianocore/edk2.git;protocol=https;name=edk2;destsuffix=git/edk2;
 \
-        
file://0001-Ignore-STATIC_ASSERT-and-NULL-definition-so-we-can-c.patch;patchdir=edk2
 \
+        
file://0001-Ignore-STATIC_ASSERTs-and-NULL-define-for-os-and-ut-builds.patch;patchdir=edk2
 \
 "
 
-SRCREV_ipmctl = "b7541dfeeca1cfdd9f9c9551d7039d3e9809245d"
-#tag: edk2-stable202102
-SRCREV_edk2 = "ef91b07388e1c0a50c604e5350eeda98428ccea6"
+SRCREV_ipmctl = "3cbc9f7f231f6f03895e0ff8ab797d22075e09b7"
+#tag: edk2-stable202108
+SRCREV_edk2 = "7b4a99be8a39c12d3a7fc4b8db9f0eab4ac688d5"
 
 S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
 
-- 
2.31.1

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#7295): 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-intel/message/7295
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/86240367/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-intel/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to