On 14-01-27 08:16 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 00:50 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 1/27/2014, 7:45 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
+++ b/conf/machine/intel-core2-32.conf
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+#@TYPE: Machine
+#@NAME: intel-core2-32
+
+#@DESCRIPTION: Machine configuration for 32 bit Intel Core 2 CPU (and later) with MMX,
SSE, SSE2, SSE3, and SSSE3 instruction set support. Supports a moderately wide range of
drivers that should boot and be usable on "typical" hardware.
+
+PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-yocto-dev"
Should this be a ?= assignment ? That way when the BSPs release, they'll
track linux-yocto versus linux-yocto-dev, and the preferred provider can
be override.
I wasn't sure on this one. These are new BSPs and until linux-yocto-dev
works for them, there is nothing. They currently use common-pc, but they
will be getting a lot of attention over the next couple of weeks to
flesh them out to support the majority of the existing BSPs in
meta-intel currently. So for that... I had left it as =. When the kernel
locks down, we'll move these to whatever that version is and leave the
preferred provider to a ?= linux-yocto.
Sounds good. Thanks for the explanation.
Bruce
_______________________________________________
meta-intel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
