On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 17:44 +0000, Kamble, Nitin A wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Burton, Ross [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 9:29 AM > > To: Kamble, Nitin A > > Cc: Zanussi, Tom; Hart, Darren; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 07/10] intel-earlyload-microcode-image.bb: > > new recipe for ealryload microcode image > > > > On 20 June 2014 19:52, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +inherit core-image > > > > Changing this to just inherit image should remove some of the cruft, but to > > be honest as this is literally just a cpio containing a single file, why > > not use > > cpio directly? > > > > Ross > > I did thought about it. I wanted to make the microcode blob available like an > initrd, which if desired can be changed easily without touching the initrd > file. > > I will see if "inherit image" simplifies the recipe further here.
I have to admit that using image generation here does seem like overkill and that a simpler "do_deploy" style task which just generates the cpio might be much faster/simpler. Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ meta-intel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
