On 7/17/14, 15:27, "Kamble, Nitin A" <[email protected]> wrote:

>> >+IMAGE_FSTYPES_meta-intel = "cpio.gz.ucode"
>> >--
>> >1.8.1.4
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> Hrm.... A meta-intel override... Do we need to introduce a layer
>>override,
>> or would the intel-common overrides be sufficient? It would reduce the
>> complexity a bit.
>> 
>I have renamed the override to intel-common now.

Well, what about the comment below?

>
>Nitin
>
>> I do see the value in the layer override though as it applies to the
>>BSPs
>> that are not yet intel-common - or won't ever be.

If you use the intel common overrides, then machines that don't share a
common kernel cannot have microcode support? That seems overly restrictive
to me.

>> 
>> So..
>> 
>> Acked-by: Darren Hart <[email protected]>
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Darren Hart                                  Open Source Technology
>> Center
>> [email protected]                                            Intel 
>> Corporation
>> 
>
>


-- 
Darren Hart                                     Open Source Technology Center
[email protected]                                       Intel Corporation


-- 
_______________________________________________
meta-intel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel

Reply via email to