On 10/10/14, 11:46, "Kamble, Nitin A" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >On 10/10/14, 9:40 AM, "Darren Hart" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>Another concern is the statement below about not allowing for a default >>configuration. Like other recent changes to meta-intel, this should be an >>opt-in thing, and as such, the BSPs need to be able to provide defaults. >>The intel-corei7-64 BSP works well as it is for a number of Intel >>platforms, and people using those may prefer not to use the >>machinesetuptool. > >As mentioned earlier, it was needed for the reconfiguration of images. The >target machine which is configured as a default target machine can be used >for this purpose. Which makes the tool transparent to them. So I am not >seeing any significant issue here. I think ability to reconfigure an image >is a great benefit for development and testing. The primary issue with eliminating the defaults from intel-corei7-64 and providing the default via machinesetuptool, is we then make machinesetuptool a requirement for that BSP for basic functionality. That isn't acceptable in my opinion. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center -- _______________________________________________ meta-intel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
