On 11/19/14 12:17, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 19 November 2014 19:40, Darren Hart <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Also, I'm not seeing similar tests elsewhere, is there a more standard > way to handle such things for systemd/networkd? Ross? > > > I'm mainly wondering why basic networkd configuration belongs in > meta-minnow. This is nothing to do with BSP enabling and everything to > do with distro policy. >
It seems to be a tricky one as the network interfaces are BSP-specific. This is a follow-on to: $ git show e3718d2 commit e3718d24e9d2bbdac00d6f1ebd8cbe2894981e4e Author: Sujith H <[email protected]> Date: 2014-07-30 systemd: Network configuration for minnow board Adding network configuration for minnow board. Which adds: +++ b/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/10-dhcp.network @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +[Match] +Name=en* + +[Network] +DHCP=yes This is specific to Minnow having an en0 interface, while other boards might have eth0, or some other name. The DHCP bit is arguably a DISTRO policy however. Perhaps a more generic version which matches a host of common names would be better and we could drop this rather basic one from meta-minnow all together. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center -- _______________________________________________ meta-intel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
