>-----Original Message----- >From: Saul Wold [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2015 11:54 PM >To: Ong, Boon Leong >Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] >Subject: Re: [meta-intel][fido][PATCH 00/16] DPDK v1.8.0 & v2.0.0 for CID >platforms > >On 07/07/2015 04:20 PM, Ong Boon Leong wrote: >> Dear maintainers, >> >> Firstly, the patch add a layer for meta-isg just like dizzy branch. >> >> Then, the patchseries add the capabillity of DPDKv1.8.0 and DPDKv2.0.0 >> on meta-intel fido branch. It reuses DPDK ingredients from dizzy >> branch as base and further customizes dpdk.inc to handle several build change >across DPDK v1.8.0 & v2.0.0. >> >> Wu, Chia Chuan has contributed the enhancement for DPDK v2.0.0 and I >> have checked and signed-off his contributions. I have validated both >> versions are building fine and the ingredients under packages-split look >> healthy >to my best knowledge. >> >> Chia Chuan has helped in testing the ingredients on CID platforms. >> >> Although it is a long series, but a lot of the commits are >> incrementally small for review. Hope that is fine with you. >> >> Appreciate your help and effort in reviewing this patchseries. >> >> If you find them good, please kindly help to merge them into fido branch. >> >Something I realized would make things much better, can these patches and along >with the QAT and zlib patches actually go into master and then be backported >into >fido? > >This will then keep master current and allow easier update/upgrade pathes for >dpdk, qat and associated work. This is the get stuff in master upstream first >and >then backport? > >Would this be possible?
Saul, ok. We will make sure that the patches are sent to be master then considered to be back-ported Into Fido. We were doing catch-up and with this that will safe effort in keeping "upgrading". -- _______________________________________________ meta-intel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
