On 7/23/15 9:38 AM, Anuj Mittal wrote: > Added the qat preferred provider to be qat16. > > Signed-off-by: Anuj Mittal <[email protected]> > --- > meta-crystalforest/conf/machine/crystalforest.conf | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/meta-crystalforest/conf/machine/crystalforest.conf > b/meta-crystalforest/conf/machine/crystalforest.conf > index 44b9bb2..84a6df2 100644 > --- a/meta-crystalforest/conf/machine/crystalforest.conf > +++ b/meta-crystalforest/conf/machine/crystalforest.conf > @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel ?= "linux-yocto" > PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto ?= "3.10%" > > +PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/qat ?= "qat16"
Your cover letter said crystal forest depends on qat15. Why are we setting it to qat16 here? Is there a reason we are doing this as qat15 and qat16 instead of just having two qat recipes with different versions and setting the PREFERRED_VERSION_qat in the machine config? e.g. qat_15-1.7.0-30.bb qat_16-2.2.0-30.bb PREFERRED_VERSION_qat ?= "15-%" There shouldn't be a need for a virtual/qat at all. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center -- _______________________________________________ meta-intel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
