On 7/27/15 4:14 AM, [email protected] wrote: > From: WU CHIA CHUAN <[email protected]> > > Hi Darren, >
Hi Chia Chuan, Please use my email ID present in the git history and MAINTAINERS: [email protected] > This patch fixed the critcal issue in build configuration variables that were > not correctly parsed by to > do_configure() task. The environment variables introduced by below patches, > $(DPDK_TARGET_MACH) & $(CONFIG_VHOST_ENABLED) > are not evaluated because the config files under dpdk/config/ folder are not > parsed by Makefile but instead by cpp compiler. > > dpdk/dpdk-1.8.0-and-2.0.0-dpdk-defconfig-select-RTE_MACHINE-type.patch > > dpdk/dpdk-1.8.0-dpdk-enable-build-config-VHOST-in-common_linuxapp-config.patch > > dpdk/dpdk-2.0.0-dpdk-enable-VHOST-and-ip_fragmentation-in-common_linuxapp.patch > > This patch also tidy up dpdk.inc by integrating common recipe from > dpdk_1.8.0.bb and dpdk_2.0.0.bb. > Kindly review and if the patch are acceptable ,please help to merge them into > fido and master branch. It took me a bit to realize this is not a patch, but a cover letter. Please follow standard practice when submitting a series with a cover letter and use: [PATCH 0/1] for the cover letter [PATCH 1/1] for the patch (or 1/2, 2/2, etc. for however many patches are in the series) > Thank you very much, > Chia Chuan > ------------------------------- > Test log: > 1.)Run core-image-sato.hddimg on target platform(River Forest - Long Brook ). > 2.)Builds core-image-sato(DPDKv1.8 and DPDKv2.0) on master and fido branch. > 3.)insmod rte_kni.ko lo_mode=lo_mode_fifo , insmod igb_uio.ko > 4.)Run dpdk test case (e.g.- version_autotest). I presume using the crystalforest BSP? -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center -- _______________________________________________ meta-intel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
