> On 23 July 2015 at 10:46, Lim Siew Hoon <[email protected]> wrote: > +Tested-by: Lim, Siew Hoon <[email protected]> > +Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <[email protected]>
> Missing Upstream-Status: Backport. Sorry. Ok, I will add in. I'm now a bit confused. Which upstream status I should be using Backport or Accepted? Read in www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines Now I felt sound like the accepted should be using. Backport also correct as well, I really backport the fixed from upstream master into this fixed version. Is this information status needed like below: Upstream-Status: Accepted - The code fixed already accepted in upstream, and expected to be in next release. - Currently backport this code fixed from upstream into 1.6.0 fixed version. - Bugzilla status for this issue is closed fixed. - Expected version info? Can I put wait for next release or totally skip first? (Because I'm really sure what is next release version in libva-intel-driver. It could be 1.6.1 or 1.7.0. This really depends on next release from libva-intel-driver.) Thanks. ....siewhoon -- _______________________________________________ meta-intel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
