On 11/9/16 9:19 AM, Jianxun Zhang wrote: > Khem, > > I think it is appropriate to have this. > > BTW, what RMC is based on actually supports non-x86 arches but meta-intel > team haven’t verified non-x86 boards.
It does not build for all of them e.g. aarch64, if someone needs it then they can fix it and relax the regexp to include the new arches > > Thanks lot! > >> On Nov 8, 2016, at 8:39 AM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Makes meta-intel behave well in multi-BSP scene >> >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> >> --- >> common/recipes-bsp/rmc/rmc.bb | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/common/recipes-bsp/rmc/rmc.bb b/common/recipes-bsp/rmc/rmc.bb >> index 9b87dd5..aeaf12e 100644 >> --- a/common/recipes-bsp/rmc/rmc.bb >> +++ b/common/recipes-bsp/rmc/rmc.bb >> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/git" >> >> DEPENDS_class-target = "gnu-efi" >> >> +COMPATIBLE_HOST = "(x86_64.*|i.86.*)-linux*" >> + >> EXTRA_OEMAKE='RMC_CFLAGS="-Wl,--hash-style=both"' >> >> # from gnu-efi, we should align arch-mapping with it. >> -- >> 1.9.1 >> >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> meta-intel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ meta-intel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
