Review +1 Thanks, Saul. I hesitated when deciding which MIT copy is for MIT, but my decision was poor…
> On Feb 28, 2017, at 1:12 PM, Saul Wold <[email protected]> wrote: > > The OE-Core LICENSE is mostly MIT, but should not be used as a checksum > file for a purely MIT licensed package. > > Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <[email protected]> > --- > common/recipes-bsp/rmc/rmc-db.bb | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/common/recipes-bsp/rmc/rmc-db.bb > b/common/recipes-bsp/rmc/rmc-db.bb > index 99565fd..f24ed11 100644 > --- a/common/recipes-bsp/rmc/rmc-db.bb > +++ b/common/recipes-bsp/rmc/rmc-db.bb > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ information." > > LICENSE = "MIT" > > -LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = > "file://${COREBASE}/LICENSE;md5=4d92cd373abda3937c2bc47fbc49d690" > +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = > "file://${COREBASE}/meta/files/common-licenses/MIT;md5=0835ade698e0bcf8506ecda2f7b4f302" > > S = "${WORKDIR}" > > -- > 2.7.4 > > -- > _______________________________________________ > meta-intel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel -- _______________________________________________ meta-intel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
