Hi Andrew, thanks a lot for the clarifications and updated info. It seems I was relaying on outaded and/or incomplete info.
> > libgbm is a virtual as it has multiple optional providers, one of which > is ti-sgx-ddk-um, our standalone libgbm has been deprecated, use the one > provided by ti-sgx-ddk-um: > > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libgbm = "ti-sgx-ddk-um" > Perfect, thanks. I was just starting to understand that the standalone libgbm has been deprecated reading http://software-dl.ti.com/processor-sdk-linux/esd/docs/latest/linux/Foundational_Components/Graphics/Migration_From_Prior_Releases.html#from-processor-sdk-6-1-to-6-2-for-am3-4-5-6 > > EGL provides window system (x11, wayland, gbm, surfaceless) integration > for both GL and GLES (and OpenVG), but our EGL implementation only > supports GLES, as that is all our GPUs support (at least on AM335x). > Full desktop GL would have to be done using SW rendering, which is > probably not what you want. I understood that full GL would have been done using SW rendering, but I thought it was the only way to get Weston working. > > So my question back is then, why are you trying to pull in 'mesa' and/or > 'mesa-gl'? Weston works fine with the stack we provide in ti-sgx-ddk-um. > Your question is very legitimate. I was pulling mesa-gl just to fulfil Weston dependencies, but thank to your info I now understand that I was doing it the wrong way. Then the question is: How should I set the providers to get Weston working fine with ti-sgx-ddk-um? Regards Luca
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12942): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/message/12942 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/74137718/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
