On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 12:51 AM Fathi Boudra <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 06:43, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > uim-sysfs seems to be copied into several layers as seen here > > > > > http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/recipes/?q=uim-sysfs > > > > I wonder if this should be consolidated into one common place ? > > perhaps meta-oe or somesuch > > layer. > > > > If not, which one should be used when both meta-ti and meta-96boards > > layers are used in > > a distro ? > > meta-96boards uim was modified for the hikey board and should be > considered as a fork. > I'll need to check the specifics and if it can use the upstream recipe > nowadays. > > Wrt if you use meta-96boards/meta-ti, then you should prefer > meta-96boards for the hikey machine. Otherwise, prefer meta-ti. > Ok in that case perhaps it should be marked with proper compatible_machine to avoid collision > > Thanks > > -Khem > > Cheers, > -- > Fathi Boudra > Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#13546): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/message/13546 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/81423234/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
