On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 04:22:20PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 02:00:31PM -0500, Bajjuri, Praneeth wrote: > > > > > > On 4/15/2021 1:24 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > >On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 12:07:05PM -0500, praneeth via > > >lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > > >>Denys, > > >> > > >>On 4/15/2021 12:10 AM, prane...@ti.com wrote: > > >>>From: Praneeth Bajjuri <prane...@ti.com> > > >>> > > >>>The current ti-linux-5.10.y integration branch doesnt have support for > > >>>non base board dtb/o form the primary latest processor board on am65 and > > >>>j7* evms yet. > > >>> > > >>>Removing these dtb/o for enabling the builds to continue. > > >>>Plan to add these blob and overlays back once the equivalent support is > > >>>added in the integrated ti-linux-5.10.y kernel. > > >>> > > >> > > >>Need your recommendation if this is the right approach to enable the > > >>builds at this early stage of LTS migration (and re-enable the > > >>overlays once the support is added in kernel). > > > > > >That's kind of normal to start a new LTS with bare minimum of dtb/o > > >support. > > > > > >But I have 2 concerns: > > > > > >1. Maybe better to just push commit with removal, instead of reverting old > > >commits - it may get quite confusing soon with reverts of reverts... > > > > makes sense. will squash in v2. > > > > > > > >2. Do you think it's still premature to make 5.10 as a default in meta-ti > > >dunfell branch? Since dunfell is kind of established stable (not a new > > >LTS), > > >anyone who updates meta-ti will go from fully working 5.4 to a very minimal > > >and bare 5.10 - may be a bad user experience... > > > > Was thinking in similar line. > > So, till the 5.10 baseline matures i will continue to use > > dunfell-next to stage the patches and keep dunfell branch untouched > > w.r.t merging 5.10 specific changes.
Another approach could be to keep using core-next branding for a bit longer, leaving 5.4 as a default, until 5.10 is ready. > > Let me know if this a good approach, The only problem in that case > > is the graphics update for 5.10 that i recently pulled to dunfell > > branch. Need to revert it to keep 5.4 dunfell experience retained. > > Try those updates first with 5.4 before reverting them, mayve they'll work. > > > > Any other ideas? > > > > > > > > > > >>>Praneeth Bajjuri (6): > > >>> Revert "conf: j7-evm: Add jailhouse dtbo" > > >>> Revert "j7-evm: add new k3-j721e-proc-board-tps65917.dtb" > > >>> Revert "j7-evm: add new infotainment DTBO file" > > >>> Revert "j7-evm: add k3-j721e-pcie-backplane.dtbo" > > >>> Revert "conf: machine: j7200-evm: Add Jailhouse overlay" > > >>> conf/machine: am65xx: Remove non-existent dtb* from 5.10 > > >>> > > >>> conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc | 11 ----------- > > >>> conf/machine/j7-evm.conf | 4 ---- > > >>> conf/machine/j7200-evm.conf | 1 - > > >>> 3 files changed, 16 deletions(-) > > >>> > > > -- Regards, Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@denix.org> PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 - https://denix.org/0x420902729A92C964 Fingerprint: 25FC E4A5 8A72 2F69 1186 6D76 4209 0272 9A92 C964
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#13700): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/message/13700 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/82110405/21656 Group Owner: meta-ti+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
