On July 22, 2022 thus sayeth Tom Rini: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 09:31:30PM -0500, Bryan Brattlof wrote: > > On July 21, 2022 thus sayeth Denys Dmytriyenko: > > > I don't think this is a correct solution, or maybe I'm not understanding > > > the > > > problem. Can you please elaborate a bit more on the problem? > > > > > > > I'm fairly new to yocto so I'm sure I've found the entirely wrong way to > > get what I wanted :) > > > > After boot it appears /etc/fstab is setup to mount our vfat boot > > partition to the /boot directory currently holding the Image and dtbs. > > I guess because uboot has already thrown the kernel and dtb into ddr at > > this point only Anand was able to notice this. > > > > My change should mount the vfat partition to /boot/firmware so we can > > access to both our spls and kernel binaries in /boot. > > > > I'm also not sure what folder name to use here. It seem like there may > > be a standard to this? Would /boot/uboot be more correct? > > So which SoCs are we talking about here? For the 64bit parts, the > intention should be that the FAT partition on p1 be functional as the > ESP. So that means mounting it to /boot/efi. But I'm not sure off-hand > how that's being treated in upstream OE around the notion of making an > image that's what a UEFI system expects.
Ideally this should be for all TI's K3 devices. I'm unfamiliar with the UEFI format and don't know if we currently follow it, however I like the idea of /boot/efi from what I googled. I also found raspian is using /boot/firmware. Could this be less of a standard than I think? ~Bryan
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#14904): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/message/14904 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/92535778/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
