On 8/10/2022 11:00, Andrew Davis wrote:
On 8/10/22 10:58 AM, Ryan Eatmon wrote:
On 8/10/2022 9:47, Andrew Davis wrote:
If we do not have TI_SECURE_DEV_PKG set then SYSFW generation will fail
if we are building for the HS platform. When TI_SECURE_DEV_PKG is not
set we assume the builder is only interested in the GP boards, so fake
generating the HS SYSFW images. These will be non-functional on HS
boards, but they would have been just as non-functional if built
without TI_SECURE_DEV_PKG set.
Have you tested what happens if they do not have it set and build the
"dummy" files, and then realize their mistake, set the variable and
build again? Do the files then build correctly, or does the sstate
cache prevent them from getting the correct thing without clearing the
cache and rebuilding everything?
Yes, changing the value of the TI_SECURE_DEV_PKG causes all packages
that use
it to get rebuilt. I was surprised bitbake was smart enough to do that
but seems
like it is.
Nice!
--
Ryan Eatmon [email protected]
-----------------------------------------
Texas Instruments, Inc. - LCPD - MGTS
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#14944):
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/message/14944
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/92938028/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
