On 11/7/2022 3:20, Manorit Chawdhry wrote:
Machine conf for J784S4 HS platform. Used J721S2 hs as reference. Signed-off-by: Manorit Chawdhry <[email protected]> --- conf/machine/j784s4-hs-evm-k3r5.conf | 11 +++++++++++ conf/machine/j784s4-hs-evm.conf | 11 +++++++++++ 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+) create mode 100644 conf/machine/j784s4-hs-evm-k3r5.conf create mode 100644 conf/machine/j784s4-hs-evm.conf diff --git a/conf/machine/j784s4-hs-evm-k3r5.conf b/conf/machine/j784s4-hs-evm-k3r5.conf new file mode 100644 index 00000000..80a228a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/conf/machine/j784s4-hs-evm-k3r5.conf @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +#@TYPE: Machine +#@NAME: J784S4 HS EVM (R5F) +#@DESCRIPTION: Machine configuration for the TI J784S4 HS EVM (R5F core) + +require conf/machine/include/k3r5.inc + +SYSFW_SOC = "j784s4" +SYSFW_CONFIG = "evm" +SYSFW_SUFFIX = "hs" + +UBOOT_MACHINE = "j784s4_evm_r5_defconfig"
All of the previous RFC versions had the string "j784s4_hs_evm_r5_defconfig", but here it is changed... And all of the other HS platforms include the _hs_ in the string. Was this intentional?
diff --git a/conf/machine/j784s4-hs-evm.conf b/conf/machine/j784s4-hs-evm.conf new file mode 100644 index 00000000..62357d62 --- /dev/null +++ b/conf/machine/j784s4-hs-evm.conf @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +#@TYPE: Machine +#@NAME: J784S4 HS EVM +#@DESCRIPTION: Machine configuration for the TI J784S4 HS EVM + +require conf/machine/j784s4-evm.conf + +UBOOT_MACHINE = "j784s4_evm_a72_defconfig"
Same comment.
+SPL_BINARY = "tispl.bin_HS" +UBOOT_BINARY = "u-boot.img_HS" +UBOOT_SYMLINK = "u-boot.img"
-- Ryan Eatmon [email protected] ----------------------------------------- Texas Instruments, Inc. - LCPD - MGTS
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#15334): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/message/15334 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/94862537/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
