On 6/13/2024 12:22 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
From: Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> This adds a facility to define multiple supported BSPs with their own preferences for individual components, as well as lets machine configs specify conditional configurations for different BSPs. Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]>
diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/include/ti-bsp.inc b/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/include/ti-bsp.inc new file mode 100644 index 00000000..3bb94a7f --- /dev/null +++ b/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/include/ti-bsp.inc @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +# Support multiple BSP providers +# The main input is TI_DEFAULT_BSP, which translates into default +# preferences for kernel, bootloader and graphics components, as +# well as a dedicated machine override. + +# Supported options are: mainline, ti-6_6, ti-6_1, bb_org +TI_DEFAULT_BSP ??= "ti-6_6"
Should this variable be named TI_DEFAULT_BSP? That implies that this is the value of the default for this feature. But in reality this variable is what chooses the TI BSP version. Should it be something like TI_BSP_VERSION instead?
-- Ryan Eatmon [email protected] ----------------------------------------- Texas Instruments, Inc. - LCPD - MGTS
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#17726): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/message/17726 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/106655975/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
