We were missing controlling the versions for linux-ti-staging-rt and linux-ti-staging-systest using the BSP framework. Since the PREFERRED_VERSION is not tied to the virtual/kernel we need two additional settings for those alternate kernel package names.
For BSPs that do not have the -rt and -systest recipes then the two new variable settings should effectively be ignored and case no issues. Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <[email protected]> --- v2: Remove the extra variables and just set PREFERRED_VERSION. meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/include/ti-bsp.inc | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/include/ti-bsp.inc b/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/include/ti-bsp.inc index 4cb2aab4..0c8f657d 100644 --- a/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/include/ti-bsp.inc +++ b/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/include/ti-bsp.inc @@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ BSP_MESA_PVR_VERSION ?= "" # ========== PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel ?= "${BSP_KERNEL_PROVIDER}" PREFERRED_VERSION_${BSP_KERNEL_PROVIDER} ?= "${BSP_KERNEL_VERSION}" +PREFERRED_VERSION_${BSP_KERNEL_PROVIDER}-rt ?= "${BSP_KERNEL_VERSION}" +PREFERRED_VERSION_${BSP_KERNEL_PROVIDER}-systest ?= "${BSP_KERNEL_VERSION}" PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/bootloader ?= "${BSP_BOOTLOADER_PROVIDER}" PREFERRED_PROVIDER_u-boot ?= "${BSP_BOOTLOADER_PROVIDER}" PREFERRED_VERSION_${BSP_BOOTLOADER_PROVIDER} ?= "${BSP_BOOTLOADER_VERSION}" -- 2.17.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#17999): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/message/17999 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/108909018/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
