On 2/3/25 7:18 AM, Aniket Limaye via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
Update the filenames for tiboot3.bin variants built by the u-boot recipe
and also the files expected by the wic image.
So far am69-sk and j784s4-evm have shared the same binman include file
and hence the same filenames for u-boot images. However, with the
configs and the devicetree being different, the same built binary does
not support both boards. Hence the filenames of images built for am69-sk
should reflect support for the same. The corresponding
This is not correct. The SK and EVM use different defconfigs, there is
no issue with two different builds producing output with the same filename.
All builds produce a u-boot.img for example, no issue here.
I've root caused the real issue, looks like a simple mistake in naming
was made in the patch taken in our U-Boot evil vendor tree. The same
patch was posted upstream also, which I've commented[0] on. So the
correct name will go in upstream, and a fix backported to our tree.
That means this patch will not be needed.
Andrew
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/[email protected]/
This change is currently only applicable to ti-u-boot-2025.01, and hence
it is restricted to the override bsp-ti-6_12.
Signed-off-by: Aniket Limaye <[email protected]>
---
This patch needs to be merged in sync with the corresponding patch for
ti-u-boot-2025.01.
The u-boot patch has also been posted to upstream u-boot and when merged
there, the next/upstream BSP packages will also need this change.
https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/[email protected]/
---
meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/am69-sk-k3r5.conf | 2 ++
meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/include/am69.inc | 7 ++++---
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/am69-sk-k3r5.conf
b/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/am69-sk-k3r5.conf
index 9d2b4cd6..376d8153 100644
--- a/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/am69-sk-k3r5.conf
+++ b/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/am69-sk-k3r5.conf
@@ -5,7 +5,9 @@
require conf/machine/include/k3r5.inc
SYSFW_SOC = "j784s4"
+SYSFW_SOC:bsp-ti-6_12 = "am69"
SYSFW_CONFIG = "evm"
+SYSFW_CONFIG:bsp-ti-6_12 = "sk"
SYSFW_SUFFIX = "hs-fs"
UBOOT_MACHINE = "am69_sk_r5_defconfig"
diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/include/am69.inc
b/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/include/am69.inc
index da8a5a8b..e82d58e2 100644
--- a/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/include/am69.inc
+++ b/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/include/am69.inc
@@ -9,10 +9,11 @@ require conf/machine/include/mesa-pvr.inc
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/gpudriver ?= "${BSP_ROGUE_DRIVER_PROVIDER}"
# Default tiboot3.bin on AM69 is for SR1.0 HS-FS
-IMAGE_BOOT_FILES += "tiboot3-j784s4-hs-fs-evm.bin"
+# Add tiboot3.bin for all SOC types, to the wic image.
+BSP_BOOTLOADER_FILES = "tiboot3-j784s4-hs-fs-evm.bin tiboot3-j784s4-hs-evm.bin"
+BSP_BOOTLOADER_FILES:bsp-ti-6_12 = "tiboot3-am69-hs-fs-sk.bin
tiboot3-am69-hs-sk.bin"
-# Since default tiboot3.bin on AM69 is for HS-FS, add a version for SR1.0 HS-SE
-IMAGE_BOOT_FILES += "tiboot3-j784s4-hs-evm.bin"
+IMAGE_BOOT_FILES += "${BSP_BOOTLOADER_FILES}"
TFA_BOARD = "j784s4"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#18251):
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/message/18251
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/110970137/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
