Hi Denys,
On 12/16/25 4:54 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 04:16:51PM -0600, Judith Mendez wrote:
Add support for the BeagleBadge which is an AM62L
based device that requires new build configuration
for U-Boot and TF-A sources.
Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <[email protected]>
---
meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/beaglebadge-ti.conf | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/beaglebadge-ti.conf
diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/beaglebadge-ti.conf
b/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/beaglebadge-ti.conf
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ff870c92
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/beaglebadge-ti.conf
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+#@TYPE: Machine
+#@NAME: AM62L Badge
+#@DESCRIPTION: Machine configuration for the TI AM62L Badge
+
+require conf/machine/include/am62lxx.inc
+
+IMAGE_FSTYPES += "ubifs ubi"
+
+MKUBIFS_ARGS ?= "-F -m 4096 -e 258048 -c 8500"
+
+UBINIZE_ARGS ?= "-m 4096 -p 256KiB -s 1024 -O 1024"
+
+KERNEL_DEVICETREE_PREFIX = " \
+ ti/k3-am62l3-badge \
+"
+
+KERNEL_DEVICETREE = ""
+
+UBOOT_MACHINE = "am62lx_badge_defconfig"
+
+TFA_BOARD = "am62l-badge"
So, everywhere here the platform is referred to as "AM62L Badge", including
device tree, TFA and U-boot configs. Why is the machine config then called
BeagleBadge? Does this come from the BeagleBoard.org?
Yes this is a beagle device, but beagle sources are still not updated
to build BeagleBadge. In TI trees, we refrained from using beagle
naming convention until today, that is why you see AM62L Badge
there.
~ Judith
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#19368):
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/message/19368
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/116817821/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
