On Tue Feb 24, 2026 at 8:55 AM CST, Ryan Eatmon wrote: > > > On 2/23/2026 5:57 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> From: Randolph Sapp <[email protected]> >> >> Move all beagle board configurations to meta-beagle. There are 2 skews >> currently: >> >> 1. A base TI configuration setting all the default variables required to >> use the device with meta-ti-bsp provided packages. >> >> 2. An override that uses meta-beagle BSP components. This includes all >> the values defined in the TI skew as well as any meta-beagle specific >> configuration. >> >> Signed-off-by: Randolph Sapp <[email protected]> >> --- >> {meta-ti-bsp => meta-beagle}/conf/machine/beaglebadge-ti.conf | 0 >> {meta-ti-bsp => meta-beagle}/conf/machine/beagleplay-ti-k3r5.conf | 0 >> {meta-ti-bsp => meta-beagle}/conf/machine/beagleplay-ti.conf | 0 >> 3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> rename {meta-ti-bsp => meta-beagle}/conf/machine/beaglebadge-ti.conf (100%) >> rename {meta-ti-bsp => meta-beagle}/conf/machine/beagleplay-ti-k3r5.conf >> (100%) >> rename {meta-ti-bsp => meta-beagle}/conf/machine/beagleplay-ti.conf (100%) >> >> diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/beaglebadge-ti.conf >> b/meta-beagle/conf/machine/beaglebadge-ti.conf >> similarity index 100% >> rename from meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/beaglebadge-ti.conf >> rename to meta-beagle/conf/machine/beaglebadge-ti.conf >> diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/beagleplay-ti-k3r5.conf >> b/meta-beagle/conf/machine/beagleplay-ti-k3r5.conf >> similarity index 100% >> rename from meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/beagleplay-ti-k3r5.conf >> rename to meta-beagle/conf/machine/beagleplay-ti-k3r5.conf >> diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/beagleplay-ti.conf >> b/meta-beagle/conf/machine/beagleplay-ti.conf >> similarity index 100% >> rename from meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/beagleplay-ti.conf >> rename to meta-beagle/conf/machine/beagleplay-ti.conf > > NAK. There is nothing needed in meta-beagle to build beagleXXXX-ti > since it uses the TI kernel/uboot. So just moving it over there does > not make sense. I don't think this is the right thing to do.
Cool. I want a second opinion. Who the hell would look at a beagleplay machine definition and not expect it to live in meta-beagle? If you bring up that this is a generic definition using only TI layers and should therefore live in meta-ti-bsp, are we going to start adopting all customer boards that use our Kernel and U-Boot recipes? I don't really know what you want, but I know what Andrew wants is dumb in that it manufactures a circular layer dependency. I'm not doing that.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#19584): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/message/19584 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/117968156/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
