On 8/28/2026 12:44 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 08:28:34PM +0530, Hari Prasath via
lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
The TI vendor kernel's dma-heap.h carries DMA_HEAP_IOCTL_EXPORT in
downstream. The standard header provided by linux-libc-headers' wouldn't
have the custom changes.Copy it straight from the kernel's staged
source tree (STAGING_KERNEL_DIR) into a separate /usr/include/ti/linux
path instead, for userspace code that needs it.
Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <[email protected]>
---
v1->v2: Address review comments in commit message and recipe description
v2->v3: Fix the patch subject prefix
.../ti-vendor-kernel-headers_1.0.bb | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/ti-vendor-kernel-headers/ti-vendor-kernel-headers_1.0.bb
diff --git
a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/ti-vendor-kernel-headers/ti-vendor-kernel-headers_1.0.bb
b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/ti-vendor-kernel-headers/ti-vendor-kernel-headers_1.0.bb
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5d570689a
--- /dev/null
+++
b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-kernel/ti-vendor-kernel-headers/ti-vendor-kernel-headers_1.0.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+SUMMARY = "TI vendor kernel uapi headers not present in mainline
linux-libc-headers"
+DESCRIPTION = "Copies select UAPI headers straight from the TI vendor kernel
source \
+tree into a TI-specific include path (/usr/include/ti/linux), for userspace
code \
+that needs them but can't rely on linux-libc-headers carrying TI-only
additions."
+LICENSE = "GPL-2.0-only"
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
"file://${COMMON_LICENSE_DIR}/GPL-2.0-only;md5=801f80980d171dd6425610833a22dbe6"
+
+PACKAGE_ARCH = "${MACHINE_ARCH}"
+
+do_configure[depends] += "virtual/kernel:do_shared_workdir"
Why do you need this dependency for do_configure? Moreover, since you don't
have do_configure nor do_compile, you might want to mark them as "noexec"
+do_install[depends] += "virtual/kernel:do_shared_workdir"
How do you ensure that virtual/kernel is the TI vendor kernel? If it's not,
you'll be copying the original unmodified header into the ti/linux location.
Should this just be part of the linux-ti-staging recipes? That way we
can correctly only include it in the versions that have this file?
+
+do_install() {
+ install -d ${D}${includedir}/ti/linux
+ install -m 0644 ${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR}/include/uapi/linux/dma-heap.h
${D}${includedir}/ti/linux/dma-heap.h
+}
+
--
2.34.1
--
Ryan Eatmon [email protected]
-----------------------------------------
Texas Instruments, Inc. - LCPD - MGTS
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#20308):
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/message/20308
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/120973161/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
