Op 3 mei 2012, om 19:15 heeft Denys Dmytriyenko het volgende geschreven: > It's a heavy patch, but my question is - how is it different from linux-3.0 > we > already have, besides the version upgrade to 3.2? Why is it called > linux-mainline, the old linux recipe is also mainline with beagle patches. > > Basically, I'm trying to understand 2 things here: > - what's the difference between this beagle patch set and the one applied on > top of e.g. 3.0.28? Is it a different dev model, goals, owner or anything else
Pretty much the same, with less PM. The goal is to keep moving closer to mainline and to a recent mainline version. With this update we'll be using the same kernel Robert Nelson uses for his ubuntu builds. > - why the name change with -mainline suffix? To namespace it like we planned for our u-boot recipes, a number of layers have linux_3.2.bb recipes that would clash :( I'm not really fond of it, but that's the price we pay for all these layers. regards, Koen _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
