On 09/17/2012 01:36 PM, Enrico wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Maupin, Chase <[email protected]> wrote:
So really I think the question is do we have an agreement on "meta-beagle" or
whatever it should be called, a timeline for it to be created and the recipes moved?
Let's make meta-ti be the foundation BSP that we can all build on top of and nothing more
or less.
Sorry to jump into the discussion but...am i the only one that thinks
that having meta-beagle, meta-panda, meta-whateverTIboard is crazy?
Whether or not Beagle is a TI board ....
It seems like the broader issue (and one I am falling over at the
moment) is that we want some image recipes in BSP's. The images have
different layer dependencies.
So we have a set of small images (such as board bring up and test
images) that depend only on oe-core, and more complex images that depend
on other layers. We can always mask the more complex images for the case
where we want to only build against oe-core, but this is not the most
convenient from a user point of view.
It seems like we need a way for an image to specify the layers it
requires and if those layers are not present, the recipe will not build,
but will not break parsing either.
Philip
Enrico
_______________________________________________
meta-ti mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
_______________________________________________
meta-ti mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
