On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> wrote: > > https://github.com/rvfh/meta-ti/commit/6342c03a0dba7d906db09630e57e2372998428df > > The recipe itself is quite trivial (I even had my own version in the works) > and I only have couple minor fixes around SRCREV and its comment... But have > you compared the defconfigs between those two patches? I know the first > version of your patch used completely different unofficial defconfig... And > you didn't specify which one you have in v2. I'd prefer to use the defconfig > that was validated by the GLP team. Thanks.
i would still prefer that we create a somehow minimalist defconfig, i don't think using the 'monster' ubuntu defconfig (it has hundreds of drivers enabled....) makes too much sense for meta-ti. we used that because it was simpler for now, but I would hold on that patch until we have a simpler config. in fact we have already a config in the tree called omap4plus_defconfig, we will base on that one instead. also we should wait until we have GST and GFX up and running before merging the kernel, to avoid a couple of iterations. _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
