On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Nicolas Dechesne <[email protected]> wrote: > well.. obviously, with the libdrm update, and our .bbappend in meta-ti > things are even worse than I had thought... and the tree doesn't even build > anymore, at least for panda, as we have: > > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "omap4|omap5" > > in the .bbappend > > so now that brings another question... should we start a 'danny' branch on > meta-ti? if we remove the libdrm and xf86-video-omap recipes from > meta-ti/master, then we break meta-ti/master with poky/danny...
I think meta-ti should have a danny branch with the current libdrm 2.4.39.bbappend because oe-core danny has 2.4.39 (at least for now), then in master it can be deleted. If 2.4.40 doesn't work (i didn't test it) then it should be fixed in oe-core (unless the fix is not acceptable in oe-core for some reason). Enrico _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
