On 05/08/2013 11:55 AM, Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Rini, Tom >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 11:11 AM >>> To: Dmytriyenko, Denys >>> Cc: Karicheri, Muralidharan; Hernandez, Carlos; [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [meta-ti] [RESEND: PATCH 2/3] keystone2: u-boot: update to add >>> gph >>> support >>> >>> On 05/07/2013 06:40 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >>>> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 06:07:10PM -0400, Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: >>> [snip] >>>>>>>> + cd ${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE} >>>>>>>> + rm -f ${UBOOT_BINARY} ${UBOOT_SYMLINK} >>>>>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SYMLINK} >>>>>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_BINARY} >>>>>>>> + rm -f ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_BINARY} ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_SYMLINK} >>>>>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_SYMLINK} >>>>>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_BINARY} >>>>>>>> + rm -f ${UBOOT_SPI_BINARY} ${UBOOT_SPI_SYMLINK} >>>>>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_SYMLINK} >>>>>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_BINARY} >>>>>>>> + rm -f ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_BINARY} ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_SYMLINK} >>>>>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_SYMLINK} >>>>>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_BINARY} } >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As we just spoke - let's try to generalize this format and combine >>>>>>> it with other similar requirements, like SPL-UART etc. There was a >>>>>>> thread back in February about this... >>>>> >>>>> This is where I have disagreement. Let us restart the discussion. Who >>>>> are the stake holders? Discuss it in this thread rather than using an >>>>> old thread. I have copied here Carlos. I don't have bandwidth to >>>>> spend too much time on this. Let us discuss it and identify what is >>>>> required to be done. >>>> >>>> Sure, let's discuss. I encourage everyone to participate, especially >>>> Carlos and Tom. >>> >>> We should try and get the generic u-boot.inc to allow for a few different >>> variables to be >>> set by the machine.conf file, and if they are, copy/symlink them as needed. >>> I think we >>> should try and fit the SPI selection into the generic u-boot-with-spl.bin >>> framework that >>> exists in u-boot today if we can, and then add some logic so that we can >>> package and >>> symlink that single file instead. > > I think we are unable to use the generic due to the specific header format > requirement from RBL (Rom > Boot loader). So we need to live with the format. How do we handle this with > the existing u-boot-spl.gph > formatting that we use?
I was off slightly it seems, we don't have everyone on u-boot-with-spl.bin, but it's u-boot-with-spl.something (bin, imx). So in this case, make up the rules for a u-boot-with-spl.gph that does what keystone needs, and we can finish up the rest of the logic around that to pick up u-boot-with-spl.* and copy/link. -- Tom _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
