On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 04:04:43PM -0700, Ash Charles wrote: > Hi, > > I was stepping through the meta-ti layer to assess support for the DSP > on OMAP3[57]. > > Two questions: > 1. It looks like there are more recent versions of the code > generation tools [1] (either 7.6.0 or 7.4.8) than 7.2.7. Is there any > reason not to use these newer version? (Apologies if this is a dumb > question---I just don't know enough about the DSP ecosystem) > > 2. It seems like ti-dsplink and ti-linuxutils (among others I suspect) > have hardcoded compiler paths and flags that supersede those provided > by bitbake. This is causing me headaches when trying to build with a > hardfp compiler (as recent SGX binaries are provided in hardfp mode). > Is there a technical limitation to compiling DSP support code with a > hard float compiler? I don't mind taking a stab at making the > makefiles a little more flexible but if the code itself relies on > non-hardfp, I'll need to rethink.
Unfortunately, DSP support in meta-ti is not maintained currently, as explained in the corresponding README file. -- Denys -- _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
