On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 08:52:45AM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/29/2015 3:37 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> >On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:20:21PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
> >>
> >>On 5/22/2015 2:12 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> >>>On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:29:46AM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
> >>>>On 5/19/2015 4:11 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> >>>>>On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:17:42PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
> >>>>>>I was following the precedent set by existing RTOS packages (See
> >>>>>>recipes-ti/xdais/ti-xdais_6.26.01.03.bb).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>These RTOS packages are build only dependencies, and they do not get
> >>>>>>installed into the target filesystem. They are primarily used for
> >>>>>>building firmware.
> >>>>>Should they be "-native" then?
> >>>>>
> >>>>I suppose they should be, but this is how is was done before.
> >>>>
> >>>>If you look at recipes-ti/includes/ti-paths.inc, you'll see that all
> >>>>paths point into STAGING_DIR_TARGET
> >>>Ok, we may end up doing this on the target at some point.
> >>>Can we simply FILES_${PN} += "*" to pick up everything installed and shove 
> >>>it
> >>>into the package? That way we won't need INSANE_SKIP and the build deps 
> >>>can be
> >>>used on the target in the future...
> >>>
> >>Adding all of these files to the ${PN} package causes them to be
> >>pulled into the filesystem. Should these instead go into the
> >>${PN}-dev package (they are purely development files), and then
> >>ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN} = "1"?
> >Actually, that's a good idea. Should we modify other recipes similarly, when
> >they only provide build dependencies for DSP?
> >
> 
> It seems this would make the most sense.
> 
> Should I submit patches for the recently updated packages which
> would be effected? They are the following:
> * ti-sysbios
> * ti-xdais

Let me push what I already have to not delay it any longer. Please send a 
followup patch to update FILES_${PN}-dev - could be a single patch across 
recipes. Thanks.


> I'm not sure about ti-xdctools since this includes xdc and other utilities.
> 
> >>>>>>On 5/8/2015 12:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> >>>>>>>>On May 8, 2015, at 7:09 AM, Jacob Stiffler <j-stiff...@ti.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>+INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = "installed-vs-shipped"
> >>>>>>>can this be fixed instead ?
> >>>>>>-- 
> >>>>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>>meta-ti mailing list
> >>>>>>meta-ti@yoctoproject.org
> >>>>>>https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
> 
-- 
_______________________________________________
meta-ti mailing list
meta-ti@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti

Reply via email to