On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 08:52:45AM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote: > > > On 5/29/2015 3:37 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:20:21PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote: > >> > >>On 5/22/2015 2:12 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >>>On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:29:46AM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote: > >>>>On 5/19/2015 4:11 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >>>>>On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:17:42PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote: > >>>>>>I was following the precedent set by existing RTOS packages (See > >>>>>>recipes-ti/xdais/ti-xdais_6.26.01.03.bb). > >>>>>> > >>>>>>These RTOS packages are build only dependencies, and they do not get > >>>>>>installed into the target filesystem. They are primarily used for > >>>>>>building firmware. > >>>>>Should they be "-native" then? > >>>>> > >>>>I suppose they should be, but this is how is was done before. > >>>> > >>>>If you look at recipes-ti/includes/ti-paths.inc, you'll see that all > >>>>paths point into STAGING_DIR_TARGET > >>>Ok, we may end up doing this on the target at some point. > >>>Can we simply FILES_${PN} += "*" to pick up everything installed and shove > >>>it > >>>into the package? That way we won't need INSANE_SKIP and the build deps > >>>can be > >>>used on the target in the future... > >>> > >>Adding all of these files to the ${PN} package causes them to be > >>pulled into the filesystem. Should these instead go into the > >>${PN}-dev package (they are purely development files), and then > >>ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN} = "1"? > >Actually, that's a good idea. Should we modify other recipes similarly, when > >they only provide build dependencies for DSP? > > > > It seems this would make the most sense. > > Should I submit patches for the recently updated packages which > would be effected? They are the following: > * ti-sysbios > * ti-xdais
Let me push what I already have to not delay it any longer. Please send a followup patch to update FILES_${PN}-dev - could be a single patch across recipes. Thanks. > I'm not sure about ti-xdctools since this includes xdc and other utilities. > > >>>>>>On 5/8/2015 12:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > >>>>>>>>On May 8, 2015, at 7:09 AM, Jacob Stiffler <j-stiff...@ti.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>+INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = "installed-vs-shipped" > >>>>>>>can this be fixed instead ? > >>>>>>-- > >>>>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>>>meta-ti mailing list > >>>>>>meta-ti@yoctoproject.org > >>>>>>https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti > -- _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list meta-ti@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti