Sam, You seem to be updating baremetal gcc from version 4 to version 6, but here you are adding new sysbios version, leaving old one alone. Will it break the old version of sysbios or does it build/work fine with the new gcc?
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 07:14:43AM -0400, Sam Nelson wrote: > Linux installer binary file name has changed compared to previous > version > Break backward compatibilty for A15 gcc tools: requires gcc-arm-none- > eabi-6-2017-q1-update or later > > Signed-off-by: Sam Nelson <[email protected]> > --- > recipes-ti/bios/ti-sysbios_6.52.00.12.bb | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 recipes-ti/bios/ti-sysbios_6.52.00.12.bb > > diff --git a/recipes-ti/bios/ti-sysbios_6.52.00.12.bb > b/recipes-ti/bios/ti-sysbios_6.52.00.12.bb > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..2bbe881 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/recipes-ti/bios/ti-sysbios_6.52.00.12.bb > @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ > +require recipes-ti/bios/ti-sysbios.inc > + > +PV = "6_52_00_12" > +PR = "r0" > + > +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = > "file://manifest_bios_${PV}.html;md5=ca549c223d732e6f69efc449795c4eeb" > + > +SRC_URI[sysbiosbin.md5sum] = "3c16af0843b5b6c5ff10512d1b586665" > +SRC_URI[sysbiosbin.sha256sum] = > "4a2b9b76f52a57f02725337db9361787eae4c917d7cf989a697ed41eb4a1e701" > + > +TI_BIN_UNPK_CMDS = "" > +TI_BIN_UNPK_ARGS = "--mode unattended --prefix ${WORKDIR}" > + > +BINFILE = "bios_${PV}.run" > +SRC_URI = > "http://software-dl.ti.com/dsps/dsps_public_sw/sdo_sb/targetcontent/bios/sysbios/${PV}/exports/${BINFILE};name=sysbiosbin"; > + > -- > 1.9.1 > > -- > _______________________________________________ > meta-ti mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti -- _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
