On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 06:09:28PM -0600, Joshua Watt wrote: > On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 17:59 -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > Thanks, have you tried building anything with this change? > > > > Right off the bat it breaks ipumm-fw, as it expects xdctools to > > reside in the > > same sysroot as BIOS, which is the target one. Fixing it. > > Hmm... thats odd. I'm though we were building the ipumm-fw recipe... > maybe not though. We are a ways behind on the morty branch right now > (which is where our patch was based originally). I'll make sure to get > us up to the HEAD and try it on Monday. > > > Also, I'm making corresponding changes in meta-arago, which uses > > xdctools as > > well. Hopefully there's not much breakage there... > > We don't use much of meta-arago (our distro is poky based), but we do > "cherry-pick" most of the non-qt based recipes through a rather ugly > process from meta-arago-extra (I don't know if they all build though).
Latest patches for meta-ti and meta-arago were posted to resolve discussed above issues. > On a side note, optional Qt support in meta-arago would be *greatly* > appreciated :) Can you be more specific? Do you have an exact components from meta-arago that you want to build w/o Qt? On the other hand, we only officially support Wayland on our platforms, not X11. Thus there are some specific graphics requirements involved - if you are trying to build something graphical, it will pull in Qt dependencies... -- Denys -- _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
