Hi, Well, does GPLv3 not require that a customer should be able to build the GPLv3 like bash and deploy it to the target? It is not directly secure-boot but the customer has a boot up sequence that starts with secure boot and then the rootfs needs to be signed. So it would not be possible to open up the device to allow a customer to deploy his own version of bash on the target. But I might have misunderstood GPLv3. I am not an expert.
BR Måns Zigher Den fre 4 feb. 2022 kl 15:19 skrev Embedded Devel <[email protected]>: > > > > On Friday 04 February 2022 15:53:42 PM (+07:00), Mans Zigher wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > A client of mine wants to have docker on it's product and they are > > having secure boot enabled which prevents us from having any GPLv3 > > licensed code on the target. > Okay, wait, why does enabling secure-boot prevent including GPLv3 packages?? > Ive never heard this before.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#7044): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-virtualization/message/7044 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/88903092/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-virtualization/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
