+1 for all that, will make stuff easier for sure.

Best Regards
Peter


On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 at 16:02, Mark Hatle <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>
> On 2/4/20 7:01 PM, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Here's a message I sent to a Xilinx executive I met in San Diego last
> August... I think it is of general interest and since there are always new
> people in the list, I thought I'd post here. It also touches the matter of
> github.com/xilinx not being a community space but a delayed mirror of
> Xilinx's internal process.
> >
> >> [...]
> >> Remember the discussion we had about Xilinx working in silo for long
> periods on linux-xlnx, then dumping months of work on GitHub? Well, right
> now we are in the process of trying out Lima for the MALI GPU.
> Unfortunately, Lima only made it into the 5.2 kernel and it is now still
> being worked on actively. One needs to mind the userspace part too.
> >>
> >> For those reasons, we are considering upgrading our kernel to 5.4 or
> some nearby LTS. Since we are tracking linux-xlnx/master periodically, it
> is quite hard for us to merge a higher version of linus' tree since we
> basically need to port forward (merge conflicts) all the Xilinx additions.
> This is hard work for us, but not as much for the developers of said
> changes, i.e. Xilinx devs.
> >>
> >> So can you tell me if and where we could find such ongoing work, even
> if it is WIP. We only use a subset of the changes Xilinx adds to the
> kernel, so maybe your current state of, say, 5.4 would work fine for us and
> allow us to continue development.
> >>
> >> If you can't share it publicly (which I doubt since all work in the
> kernel is basically GPL'd), could we arrange an alternate sharing strategy?
> Even if it is a one time thing.
> >>
> >> Or maybe what would be simpler would be to create a branch on your
> linux-xlnx github called 5.4-wip for example. This way people know what to
> expect in this branch. Or maybe upstream 5.4 already contains everything we
> need?
> >>
> >> Thanks for your help, or forwarding this to the right person if needed.
> >>
> >> Cheers!
> >
> >
> > Here's one of our earlier mention of this issue
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-xilinx/message/4517
> >
> > I was reminded of this earlier today when I visited the list of open MR
> on github/xilinx/linux-xlnx and found some other developer had also
> submitted a cyclic DMA fix!!
> >
> > The way xilinx runs github right now is broken. I really don't want to
> be bitchy about this, I want things to improve and am willing to
> participate honestly in the discussion. Today I just want to mention to the
> new guard what many have echoed in the past and has never (to my knowledge)
> been addressed by Xilinx. (That is until Mark partly did earlier today.
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-xilinx/message/4645)
> >
> > It would be better for all if work could be done in real time on github
> (or some other open platform), possibly in another group perhaps
> (linux-wip) so that release following customers know what to expect and
> community participators such as us here can be involved during the process.
>
> Frankly, I agree.. I'm working toward this goal.. but it's going to be
> April
> before I can make any progress moving closer to this approach.  (Part of
> the
> reason I was hired by Xilinx, was specifically to push for this change and
> workflow.. but there are other business realities in play that is making
> it go
> slower then I wanted.)
>
> Sorry, I don't have further roadmap to share on how we're going to get
> there..
> but after/during April is the current plan.
>
> --Mark
>
> > Hey... my 2 cents.
> >
> > Oh, and don't forget about my question regarding linux-xlnx on 5.[45] ;)
> >
> > Cheers!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#4652): 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-xilinx/message/4652
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/70987364/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-xilinx/unsub  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to