Thanks for the report, I'll look into this. On 1/12/21 7:10 AM, Leon Woestenberg wrote: > Hello Mark, > > In meta-xilinx commit 4aa4cb1d986edeed6abd34778484ec7ddbc99891 the patch > meta-xilinx-standalone/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10/additional-microblaze-multilibs.patch > > does not apply. It tries to patch > gcc/config/microblaze/t-microblaze > > via > meta-xilinx-standalone/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-source_10.%.bbappend > > To reproduce, checkout latest gatesgarth branches (as of Jan 12th, 2020): > > local.conf has the following non-defaults added: > MACHINE="microblaze-pmu" > DISTRO="xilinx-standalone" > > bblayer.conf has the following layer stack: > poky/meta \ > poky/meta-poky \ > poky/meta-yocto-bsp \ > meta-openembedded/meta-oe \ > meta-openembedded/meta-python \ > meta-xilinx/meta-xilinx-bsp \ > meta-xilinx/meta-xilinx-contrib \ > meta-xilinx/meta-xilinx-standalone \ > meta-xilinx-tools \ > > bitbake firmware-pmu > > Could you please see what is off here? ( I suspect GCC 9 vs 10 related. ) > > Regards, > > Leon. >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4793): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-xilinx/message/4793 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/79622386/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-xilinx/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
