Hi Mark,

I have resolved all the compilation issues.

However, booting stops at the level of SPL:

U-Boot SPL 2021.01 (Jun 01 2021 - 11:54:06 +0000)
PMUFW:  v1.1
Loading new PMUFW cfg obj (2216 bytes)
Silicon version:        3
EL Level:       EL3
Chip ID:        zu6eg
Multiboot:      0
Trying to boot from MMC2

I see you worked on adding EFI/Secure boot support. You also enabled the
secure boot by default in xilinx_zynqmp_virt_defconfig. Could this be
the problem? Have you tested it and does it run smoothly with SD card?
Do changes between u-boot-xlnx 2020.2 and 2021.1 require any
modification in other recipes? For example, I see that wic I still
creating a regular image, without a dedicated EFI partition. For secure
boot I imagine that certificates would be involved as well, though I
don't see anything regarding this in the master branch of meta-xilinx.

Regards,

Adrian

On 16.08.2021 20:12, Adrian Fiergolski wrote:
> Hi Sai and Mark,
>
> Sai, your commit [1] introduces error, as patches do not apply. Have you
> tried to run it before the commit?
>
> In fact, most of the patches are not needed anymore and I have cleaned
> the recipes accordingly [2].
>
> Anyway Mike, with the latest version of the pmu-firmware I am getting
> linking error:
>
> git/lib/sw_apps/zynqmp_pmufw/src/xpfw_core.c:192: undefined reference to
> `XIpiPsu_TriggerIpi'
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>
> Does it ring a bell? As I assume xlnx_rel_v2021.1 to be stable in
> embeddedsw [3] (is it?), do I need to enable extra libraries in the
> pmu-firmware recipes? If so which one and how? Have you tried to run it
> recently?
>
> Regards,
>
> Adrian
>
> [1] 4218e11363ffb41799a89794a0a8fe6d36b86417
> [2] https://github.com/adrianf0/meta-xilinx/tree/hardknott
> [3] https://github.com/Xilinx/embeddedsw
>
> On 16.08.2021 19:14, Adrian Fiergolski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As explained by Daniel in other thread, "the master branch has bumped
>> gcc to v11 already, but Yocto hardknott uses v10. Commit 21f495ec08
>> ("Upgrade newlib, libgloss
>> 3.3 -> 4.1") (just before the gcc bump) fails to build as the binutils
>> patches don't apply." Thus I forked [1] from that commit and started to
>> make it work with hardknott. I have already aligned microblaze binutils
>> patches so they apply and compile properly. However, I see that there
>> are still some issues with other recipes which need to be addressed.
>> Feel free to contribute.
>>
>> Xilinx maintainers: feel free to pull to branch from my repository as a
>> base of hardknott branch in the official repository.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Adrian
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/adrianf0/meta-xilinx/tree/hardknott
>>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#4915): 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-xilinx/message/4915
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/84928826/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-xilinx/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to