On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mike, > > On 07/26/2016 03:59 AM, Mike Looijmans wrote: >> >> Not all zynqmp SoCs have a MALI GPU built in. Thus recommending >> kernel-module-mali for all zynqmp machines is incorrect. Move >> the recommendation to the board config. >> >> This also makes for a nicer syntax, having less-specific platform >> overrides for machine-specific variables just doesn't look right. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans <[email protected]> >> --- >> conf/machine/include/machine-xilinx-default.inc | 4 ---- >> conf/machine/zcu102-zynqmp.conf | 3 +++ >> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> > <...> > Yes this is true, after the road map has been made clear with CG parts, > however please see my previous comments on mali-modules, once resolved we > should move it to board-specific
It appears that the product table is public showing CG, EG and EV parts respectively. http://www.xilinx.com/products/silicon-devices/soc/zynq-ultrascale-mpsoc.html#productTable Is it worth having three separate includes for the CG/EG/EV parts? So that this sort of config can be easily included for machines/boards that use the specified part? This would allow additional configuration that would only be relevant to those variants as well. Regards, Nathan > > Thanks > Manju > > > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > meta-xilinx mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx -- _______________________________________________ meta-xilinx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx
