On 18 November 2016 at 11:04, Manjukumar Matha <[email protected]> wrote: > There are cases where we want different providers for ATF depending on > development methodology. Having provides will enable easier switch for > ATF development. > > Signed-off-by: Manjukumar Matha <[email protected]> > --- > recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware_git.bb | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware_git.bb > b/recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware_git.bb > index 9f29fc4..4f1c017 100644 > --- a/recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware_git.bb > +++ b/recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware_git.bb > @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ DESCRIPTION = "ARM Trusted Firmware" > LICENSE = "BSD" > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://license.md;md5=829bdeb34c1d9044f393d5a16c068371" > > +PROVIDES = "virtual/atf"
Anything against having this as "virtual/arm-trusted-firmware" instead? Which would go in-line with the changes made to the output file names in patch 3/4 of this series. Regards, Nathan > + > inherit deploy > > DEPENDS += "u-boot-mkimage-native" > -- > 2.7.4 > > -- > _______________________________________________ > meta-xilinx mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx -- _______________________________________________ meta-xilinx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx
