> -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Rossi [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 11:51 PM > To: Manjukumar Harthikote Matha <[email protected]> > Cc: Alistair Francis <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH 5/7] Update recipes for Xilinx v2017.3 > release > > On 11 October 2017 at 09:05, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Nathan, > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] [mailto:meta-xilinx- > >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Alistair Francis > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 3:13 PM > >> To: Nathan Rossi <[email protected]> > >> Cc: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH 5/7] Update recipes for Xilinx > >> v2017.3 release > >> > >> On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 2:57 AM, Nathan Rossi <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > Update the arm-trusted-firmware, pmu-firmware, u-boot-xlnx, > >> > linux-xlnx, qemu-xilinx and qemu-devicetrees recipes for to the > >> > 'xilinx-v2017.3' > >> > release tags. > >> > > >> > Drop/update existing patches where applicable. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Rossi <[email protected]> > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <[email protected]> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Alistair > >> > >> > --- > > > > <.....> > > > >> > diff --git > >> > a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-xlnx/v2017.1/arm-zynqmp-xilinx_zynqmp.h > >> > -Au > >> > to-boot-in-JTAG-if-imag.patch > >> > b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-xlnx/v2017.3/arm-zynqmp-xilinx_zynqmp.h > >> > -Au > >> > to-boot-in-JTAG-if-imag.patch > >> > similarity index 100% > >> > rename from > >> > recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-xlnx/v2017.1/arm-zynqmp-xilinx_zynqmp.h-A > >> > uto -boot-in-JTAG-if-imag.patch rename to > >> > recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-xlnx/v2017.3/arm-zynqmp-xilinx_zynqmp.h-A > >> > uto -boot-in-JTAG-if-imag.patch diff --git > > > > meta-xilinx should not be a holding ground for non upstreamable patches. > > Implementation has to be from kernel-fitimage.bbclass inclusion. > > Please don't add this in meta-xilinx > > > > This is not adding it, just moving the existing patch to apply to the newer > u-boot > recipe. >
Agreed, we are porting a non-upstreamable patch regardless. > It does however need to go though. I completely disagree, it's not an option to proceed. I cannot accept this path. But I have not had a chance to sort that out yet, > the biggest problem with using fit is that it would need to embed the rootfs > (which is > passed at runqemu time). Which means that using a disk interface is a better > way to > go, but since qemu boots u-boot instead of a kernel directly it is not so > straight > forward to pass the root= param to the kernel. > We could also look into kernel-fitimage.bbclass to introduce the fit to resolve. Thanks, Manju -- _______________________________________________ meta-xilinx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx
