> -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Rossi [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 11:16 PM > To: Manjukumar Harthikote Matha <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] machine-xilinx-default.inc: Add default > tune for > multilib lib32 builds > > On 24 October 2017 at 10:05, Manjukumar Matha <manjukumar.harthikote- > [email protected]> wrote: > > On ZU+ machines, we set the default tune for the lib32 multilib > > configuration.This allows users to select multilib by simply requiring > > conf/multilib.conf in their build setups. > > > > Signed-off-by: Cyril Chemparathy <[email protected]> > > Tested-by: Bhargava Sreekantappa Gayathri > > <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Manjukumar Matha > > <[email protected]> > > --- > > conf/machine/include/machine-xilinx-default.inc | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/conf/machine/include/machine-xilinx-default.inc > > b/conf/machine/include/machine-xilinx-default.inc > > index 137f49e..38b7dd3 100644 > > --- a/conf/machine/include/machine-xilinx-default.inc > > +++ b/conf/machine/include/machine-xilinx-default.inc > > @@ -41,3 +41,6 @@ XSERVER ?= " \ > > > > XSERVER_EXT ?= "" > > XSERVER_EXT_zynqmp ?= "xf86-video-armsoc" > > + > > +# Support multilib on zynqmp > > +DEFAULTTUNE_virtclass-multilib-lib32_zynqmp = "armv7vethf-neon-vfpv4" > > So you had sent a very similar patch a few months back, I had commented then > that > it would be a good idea to have the > DEFAULTTUNE_virtclass-multilib-lib32 set in tune-zynqmp.inc. Is there an > issue with > setting the DEFAULTTUNE that way? > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-xilinx/2017-June/002985.html > I don’t think there is an issue with that, we tested against thumb setting but did not move the patch to tune-zynqmp.inc, will send a V2
Thanks, Manju -- _______________________________________________ meta-xilinx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx
