On 29-11-17 09:29, Syed Syed wrote:
git-...@xilinx.com is internal to Xilinx. You should use g...@xilinx.com. It is
still in active state. I don’t know why no-one acknowledged your patches there.
Can you re-try? I will try to make sure it reaches right folks at Xilinx.
Appreciate your efforts.
I resent the series, to g...@xilinx.com, with a BCC to a private e-mail account
and verified that all three arrived safely.
If you did not receive it, please complain loudly to your IT department.
Thanks
-syed
Kind regards,
Mike Looijmans
System Expert
TOPIC Products
Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best
Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
E-mail: mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com
Website: www.topicproducts.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
-----Original Message-----
From: meta-xilinx-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-xilinx-
boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Mike Looijmans
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 11:54 AM
To: Manjukumar Harthikote Matha <manju...@xilinx.com>; Martin
Siegumfeldt <m...@gomspace.com>; meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] QSPI Issues related to Linux 4.9
I re-sent the three patches as series to git-...@xilinx.com with a CC to you.
Mike.
On 28-11-17 19:56, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your work, please send patches to git-...@xilinx.com
Thanks,
Manju
Kind regards,
Mike Looijmans
System Expert
TOPIC Products
Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best
Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
E-mail: mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com
Website: www.topicproducts.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
-----Original Message-----
From: meta-xilinx-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-xilinx-
boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Mike Looijmans
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2017 2:57 AM
To: Martin Siegumfeldt <m...@gomspace.com>;
meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] QSPI Issues related to Linux 4.9
There are several bugs (at least 3) in the Xilinx tree relating to
QSPI, I implemented fixes in our tree and sent patches to
g...@xilinx.com (with CC to several Xilinx people).
I did not receive any feedback so far.
I get the impression that the g...@xilinx.com e-mail is no longer in use.
Better suggestions are welcome.
The QSPI code from Xilinx is not part of mainline Linux (and for good
reason it seems), so sending patches to mainline linux is pointless.
(If you're designing Zynq boards, my advice for now is to steer away
from the dual-qspi config, it's almost useless on the Zynq and forces
you to use Xilinx' tree instead of mainline)
On 24-11-17 14:02, Martin Siegumfeldt wrote:
Hi,
I recently updated the Linux kernel for a custom board based on z7k
from Xilinx
version 4.6 to 4.9, and spend a few days debugging issues related to
the QSPI flash (n25q512a13). By coincidence I stumbled upon
https://github.com/topic-embedded-
products/linux/commit/8f89736e4e4c116b442f56b3414c33b36f99bc18#diff-
49f4e70fe9e60ff773b57164b9e03dbb (thanks Mike) which resolved the
issue. It looks like this commit has been left out during the 4.9
transition. Since I am apparently not the only one encountering this
issue I wonder if this is planned fixed upstream (upstream as in the
Xilinx fork I mean)
Thanks,
Martin
Kind regards,
Mike Looijmans
System Expert
TOPIC Products
Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best
Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
E-mail: mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com
Website: www.topicproducts.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
--
_______________________________________________
meta-xilinx mailing list
meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx
--
_______________________________________________
meta-xilinx mailing list
meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx
--
_______________________________________________
meta-xilinx mailing list
meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx
